The over-the-counter (OTC) market has become a cornerstone of the global virtual asset ecosystem, serving high-net-worth individuals, institutional investors, and exchanges with seamless large-volume trading solutions. By offering customized transaction mechanisms, OTC desks facilitate major trades without disrupting open market prices—delivering enhanced privacy, security, and liquidity.
Recent data highlights a surge in OTC activity: trading volume grew by 106% in 2024 alone. Notably, stablecoins dominated this growth, accounting for approximately 95% of total OTC volume, with their year-on-year increase reaching 147%. Geographically, Europe leads institutional OTC demand at 38.5%, followed by North America, Asia, and the Middle East—each capturing around 15.4%.
Despite this momentum, OTC providers face mounting compliance challenges across jurisdictions.
The Evolving Compliance Landscape for OTC Providers
While traditional financial markets operate under well-defined regulatory frameworks, the crypto sector—especially OTC trading—remains in flux. Although global regulators are tightening oversight in anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) practices, inconsistent rules across regions create uncertainty for cross-border OTC operations.
OTC desks often execute private transactions outside public order books, increasing risks of market manipulation and information asymmetry. Without transparent pricing benchmarks, these platforms must implement rigorous internal controls to ensure fair valuation and prevent systemic abuse.
👉 Discover how leading platforms maintain compliance while scaling globally.
Furthermore, as OTC businesses frequently engage in international transactions, they must navigate divergent legal standards—from data privacy laws like GDPR to varying AML thresholds. This complexity makes regulatory licensing not just a legal necessity but a strategic advantage.
A valid license enhances credibility, strengthens client trust, and opens doors to regulated financial ecosystems.
Regulatory Approaches: Hong Kong, EU, and United States Compared
Though no universal OTC regulatory standard exists today, key markets such as Hong Kong, the European Union, and the United States are shaping distinct compliance pathways. Understanding these differences is essential for any OTC operator planning global expansion.
1. Hong Kong: Emerging OTC Licensing Framework
In February 2025, Hong Kong’s Financial Services and Treasury Bureau (FSTB) released a consultation paper proposing to regulate virtual asset OTC services under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Ordinance (AMLO). While the framework is still under review—with final implementation details expected later in 2025—it signals Hong Kong’s intent to formalize oversight of OTC activities.
Under the proposed rules, all entities providing virtual asset OTC services must apply for authorization from the Hong Kong Customs and Excise Department (C&ED) and adhere strictly to AML/KYC obligations.
Key compliance requirements include:
- AML and KYC Protocols
OTC operators must conduct risk-based customer due diligence (CDD), verify identities for every transaction, monitor trading behavior, and report suspicious activities. Special scrutiny applies to high-value transactions to prevent illicit fund flows. - Compliance Documentation
Firms will be required to submit comprehensive documentation outlining their AML policies, KYC procedures, and risk mitigation strategies. These documents will serve as evidence of adherence during regulatory audits. - Ongoing Supervision
The C&ED will conduct regular reviews of licensed OTC providers, focusing on transparency in large trades and overall market integrity. Continuous compliance monitoring will be mandatory.
This emerging regime aligns closely with Hong Kong’s broader virtual asset service provider (VASP) licensing model, emphasizing accountability in private-market dealings.
2. European Union: Unified Oversight via MiCA
The EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) establishes a harmonized legal framework for crypto service providers across the European Economic Area (EEA). While MiCA does not define a standalone “OTC dealer” category, firms engaging in order execution, trade matching, or custody of crypto assets fall under the Crypto Asset Service Provider (CASP) classification—and require formal registration.
Once licensed in one EU member state, a CASP can operate throughout the EEA under passporting rights.
MiCA imposes strict requirements on OTC-relevant activities:
- Robust AML/KYC Standards
Similar to Hong Kong, MiCA mandates thorough customer identification and ongoing transaction monitoring. Risk-based CDD is required for all clients, with enhanced due diligence for politically exposed persons (PEPs) and high-risk jurisdictions. - Transparency and Risk Disclosure
CASPs must provide clear disclosures about asset risks, pricing methodologies, and potential conflicts of interest. This ensures that even non-public OTC trades maintain a level of investor protection. - Operational Resilience and Governance
Registered providers must maintain adequate capital reserves, implement cybersecurity measures, and establish internal controls against market abuse. - Cross-Border Compliance Obligations
Even non-EU-based OTC firms serving EU clients may need to comply with MiCA if their activities have substantial effects within the bloc. Data handling must also conform to GDPR standards, adding another layer of complexity for international operators.
👉 Learn how top-tier exchanges prepare for MiCA compliance ahead of deadlines.
3. United States: Fragmented but Stringent Regulation
Unlike Hong Kong and the EU, the U.S. lacks a unified federal licensing system for crypto OTC desks. Instead, regulation is fragmented across multiple agencies and state-level regimes.
Key regulatory bodies include:
- Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
If an OTC desk trades tokens classified as securities under the Howey Test, it may be deemed a broker-dealer and subject to SEC registration and oversight. This applies particularly to secondary market trading of tokenized equities or investment contracts. - Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)
For derivatives or futures involving crypto commodities like Bitcoin or Ethereum, the CFTC asserts jurisdiction. OTC desks offering such products must comply with commodity trading rules. - Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)
Any entity functioning as a money services business (MSB)—including many OTC providers—must register with FinCEN and follow Bank Secrecy Act requirements. This includes maintaining AML programs, conducting KYC checks, and filing Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs).
At the state level, New York’s BitLicense stands out as a comprehensive regulatory regime. Any company offering virtual currency services in New York—including OTC trading—must obtain a BitLicense. Requirements include:
- Strong AML/KYC policies
- Minimum capital reserves
- Regular financial and operational reporting
This patchwork of federal and state regulations increases compliance costs for multi-jurisdictional OTC operators.
Strategic Compliance Recommendations for Global OTC Operators
Given the divergent approaches across major markets, successful OTC businesses must adopt adaptive compliance strategies:
- Build Regional Compliance Teams
Establish local compliance units familiar with jurisdiction-specific laws—especially critical in decentralized environments like the U.S. - Develop a Unified Global AML/KYC Framework
Create a standardized baseline policy that can be tailored regionally while ensuring consistency in core controls. - Enhance Customer Due Diligence (CDD)
Implement rigorous background checks and real-time monitoring tools to detect red flags early. - Invest in Transaction Surveillance Systems
Deploy AI-driven monitoring to identify anomalies indicative of market manipulation or wash trading. - Conduct Regular Cross-Border Training & Audits
Keep teams updated on evolving regulations through continuous education and internal audits.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Do all OTC crypto traders need a license?
A: It depends on jurisdiction. In Hong Kong and the EU, licensing is mandatory for institutional-scale operations. In the U.S., licensing depends on whether the firm qualifies as an MSB or broker-dealer.
Q: How does MiCA affect non-EU OTC providers?
A: If your platform serves EU clients or advertises within the bloc, you may need to comply with MiCA—even if based offshore.
Q: What role does KYC play in OTC trading?
A: KYC is central to preventing money laundering. All major jurisdictions require verified identity checks before executing trades.
Q: Are stablecoin OTC trades less regulated?
A: No. Despite their perceived stability, stablecoin transactions are subject to full AML scrutiny due to their frequent use in cross-border value transfer.
Q: Can one compliance program work globally?
A: While a core framework helps, local adaptations are necessary due to differing legal standards in places like New York or Germany.
Q: What happens if an OTC desk operates without proper licensing?
A: Penalties include heavy fines, operational shutdowns, reputational damage, and potential criminal liability in severe cases.
👉 Explore compliant trading infrastructure designed for institutional crypto growth.