Hong Kong Issues First Crypto License for Professional Investors – Will Beijing Follow?

·

On December 15, OSL Exchange, operated by BC Technology Group (863.HK), announced it had received the first virtual asset trading license from the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong. The license covers Type 1 (Dealing in Securities) and Type 7 (Providing Automated Trading Services) regulated activities, marking a historic milestone in Hong Kong’s journey toward formal crypto regulation.

This approval signifies that Hong Kong has officially entered the era of licensed digital asset platforms. While the SFC had signaled preliminary approval as early as August 2020 for OSL Digital Securities, the final licensing represents a concrete step forward in legitimizing institutional-grade crypto trading under a clear regulatory framework.

👉 Discover how regulated crypto platforms are shaping the future of digital finance.

Regulatory Framework: What the License Means

In its November 6, 2019 Position Paper, the SFC clarified that any online platform offering trading services for at least one security token must be licensed under Type 1 and Type 7 regulations. This classification brings crypto exchanges under the same broad oversight as traditional financial institutions.

To qualify, applicants must have at least two responsible officers with relevant qualifications or experience, operate as a Hong Kong-based entity (or a foreign company registered locally), and maintain proper corporate governance structures.

Who Can Use the Platform?

Importantly, OSL’s newly licensed platform does not serve retail investors. Access is restricted to professional investors, defined by Hong Kong law as:

For mainland Chinese investors, additional requirements apply: a Hong Kong bank account and transactions conducted solely in Hong Kong dollars.

This high barrier reflects the SFC’s cautious approach—prioritizing market integrity and investor protection over mass adoption. It also aligns with global trends where early crypto regulation often begins with institutional access before expanding to retail.

Security, Compliance, and Investor Protection

OSL emphasized that its platform will offer trading in high-quality digital assets, including Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and carefully vetted Security Token Offerings (STOs). To ensure compliance:

Additionally, clients benefit from both traditional investor protection mechanisms and new safeguards specifically designed for virtual assets by the SFC—setting a benchmark for secure, transparent crypto trading.

How Does Hong Kong’s Approach Compare?

Unlike jurisdictions such as Japan and Singapore, which have enacted dedicated crypto laws, Hong Kong regulates digital assets within its existing financial framework. There is currently no standalone Virtual Assets Act. Instead, the SFC applies existing securities regulations to platforms dealing in tokenized securities.

Key characteristics of Hong Kong’s virtual asset regime include:

While this model ensures strong oversight, it limits market participation and may slow broader adoption compared to more inclusive regimes.

Other Players in the Hong Kong Market

Other major players like Huobi (1611.HK) and OKEx (1499.HK) have made moves in Hong Kong but under different regulatory paths. Huobi Wallet obtained a Trust or Company Service Provider license, while Huobi Asset Management secured Type 4 (Advising on Securities) and Type 9 (Asset Management) licenses. OKEx’s subsidiary received a Trust Company registration certificate.

However, these are not virtual asset trading licenses. These firms cannot operate crypto exchanges under the SFC’s new framework unless they restructure their business models—potentially abandoning retail-focused operations.

👉 See how leading exchanges are adapting to evolving regulatory landscapes worldwide.

Regional Context: Singapore’s Parallel Move

Just five days before OSL’s announcement, DBS Bank—the commercial arm of Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund Temasek—launched its own institutional crypto exchange. It supports trading between four fiat currencies (SGD, USD, HKD, JPY) and four major cryptocurrencies: BTC, ETH, Bitcoin Cash, and XRP. The platform also offers custody services.

BC Technology Group confirmed a technical services agreement with DBS Bank, highlighting growing collaboration between traditional finance and blockchain infrastructure providers.

This regional momentum suggests a shift toward institutional-grade digital asset ecosystems in Asia—one where compliance, security, and professional access are paramount.

Will Beijing Follow Hong Kong’s Lead?

Given the close coordination between Beijing and Hong Kong’s financial authorities—evident during initiatives like the STAR Market reform—it's reasonable to ask whether mainland China might adopt similar frameworks.

While China maintains a strict ban on cryptocurrency issuance and trading for retail investors, recent signals suggest nuance:

These developments hint at a potential future where regulated, institution-only crypto trading could be explored—possibly modeled after Hong Kong’s cautious, compliance-first approach.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Can retail investors use OSL’s licensed platform?
A: No. Only professional investors meeting minimum asset thresholds (HK$8 million for individuals) can access the platform.

Q: Is this the first crypto license in Asia?
A: No—Japan and Singapore have had formal licensing regimes for years. However, it is Hong Kong’s first official virtual asset trading license under SFC oversight.

Q: What cryptocurrencies are available on OSL?
A: Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and select Security Token Offerings (STOs) that pass rigorous screening.

Q: Do I need to be a Hong Kong resident to trade on OSL?
A: Not necessarily, but you must have a Hong Kong bank account and conduct transactions in HKD—even if you're based outside Hong Kong.

Q: How does Hong Kong regulate crypto without a dedicated law?
A: By applying existing securities regulations (Types 1 and 7) to platforms offering security tokens, effectively bringing them under SFC supervision.

Q: Could mainland China adopt a similar model?
A: While full retail access remains unlikely soon, Beijing may consider a professional-investor-only framework in the future, especially if stability and control can be ensured.

👉 Explore regulated crypto opportunities tailored for professional investors today.