In the heart of Usk, Washington—a quiet, unincorporated community of about 1,000 residents nestled along the Pend Oreille River—something unexpected is taking root. Deep inside the abandoned Ponderay Newsprint mill, the hum of high-powered computing equipment has replaced the clatter of papermaking machinery. Thousands of servers blink rhythmically, working tirelessly to solve complex mathematical problems in a race to mine Bitcoin.
This transformation marks a bold new chapter for the region. The mill, once the county’s largest employer before its closure and bankruptcy, has been acquired by Allrise Capital, a California-based investment firm. Now, through its subsidiary Merkle Standard, the company is building one of the most ambitious cryptocurrency mining operations in the Pacific Northwest.
👉 Discover how sustainable crypto mining could reshape rural economies.
A New Era for an Old Industrial Site
The project represents more than just technological reinvention—it's a gamble on the future of digital assets amid volatile market conditions. With Bitcoin’s value fluctuating dramatically—from highs above $60,000 in 2021 to around $20,000 in mid-2022—the crypto mining industry has faced widespread contraction. Many operations in the Northwest have shuttered due to rising energy costs and falling returns.
Yet, Merkle Standard is pushing forward. In February 2022, the company announced a joint venture with Bitmain, a leading manufacturer of mining hardware, to deploy up to 500 megawatts of capacity and over 150,000 mining rigs, including advanced water-cooled units. If fully realized, this would rank among the largest sustainable crypto mining platforms in North America.
Monty Stahl, Chief Operating Officer of Merkle Standard, sees potential not only in profit but in revitalizing a struggling rural economy. “We’re committed to bringing jobs back,” he said during a tour of the facility in September 2022. He estimates the operation could create 40 direct jobs in crypto mining and potentially 150 more if the newsprint mill resumes operations.
Energy, Environment, and Community Concerns
Despite promises of sustainability and economic renewal, the project has sparked debate. Merkle Standard holds permission to draw up to 100 megawatts annually—more than all other customers of the Pend Oreille County Public Utility District (PUD) combined. For context, that exceeds the output of the local Box Canyon Dam, which previously powered the mill.
While Stahl claims the operation uses renewable energy credits and can reduce consumption during peak demand, critics remain skeptical. Glenn Blackmon, senior energy policy adviser for Washington State, warns that diverting large amounts of clean electricity to blockchain processing may hinder broader climate goals.
“We need every watt of clean power we can get to electrify transportation and buildings,” Blackmon said. “Adding novel loads like crypto mining creates additional pressure on our energy system.”
Environmental advocates also question long-term sustainability. The White House recently issued a report highlighting that crypto mining consumes between 120 and 240 billion kWh globally per year—equivalent to Argentina or Australia’s total annual usage—and generates 25–50 million metric tons of CO₂ emissions in the U.S. alone.
Ben Richards, a U.S. Army veteran and founder of Protect Pend Oreille, worries about noise pollution and ecological disruption. He and others challenged the county’s approval of the project, arguing that full-scale operations could disturb wildlife, including seasonal American white pelicans.
Stahl dismisses such concerns: “The old wood chip processor was louder.” But Richards points out one key difference: “That machine didn’t run 24/7.”
From Boom to Bust—and Back?
Crypto mining isn’t new to Eastern Washington. In the 2010s, cheap hydroelectric power attracted miners from across the globe to Chelan, Douglas, and Grant counties. Warehouses and industrial spaces were converted into data centers overnight. Some operators brought suitcases of cash; others siphoned power illegally, causing infrastructure strain and even fires.
Local utilities responded by hiking rates for high-demand users. Many miners left or went bankrupt. By 2023, Washington accounted for just 4% of national Bitcoin mining activity, according to the University of Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index.
Today’s operators are more cautious—and more integrated. As Louis Szablya of Grant County PUD noted: “It’s no longer the tail wagging the dog. Crypto mining is now just one of many industries making regular requests.”
FAQ: Understanding Crypto Mining in Rural Communities
Q: What is proof-of-work mining?
A: It's a consensus mechanism where computers compete to solve complex math problems. The first to solve earns newly minted cryptocurrency, like Bitcoin. This process secures the network but requires massive computational power—and energy.
Q: Is crypto mining really sustainable?
A: It depends on the energy source. Operations using renewable energy and heat recovery systems (like using server heat to warm buildings) can reduce environmental impact. However, most still rely heavily on grid electricity.
Q: How much electricity does a large mining facility use?
A: Facilities like Merkle Standard can consume over 100 megawatts—enough to power tens of thousands of homes. Scaling to 500 MW would rival small cities.
Q: Can these projects bring lasting jobs?
A: While construction and maintenance roles are created, crypto mining is highly automated. Job creation is modest compared to traditional manufacturing or timber industries.
Q: Why locate in small towns like Usk?
A: Proximity to low-cost hydropower, available industrial space, and fewer zoning restrictions make rural areas attractive for energy-intensive operations.
Q: What happens when miners leave?
A: Equipment can be relocated quickly. Communities risk being left with little economic benefit after initial investment fades—unless diversification plans (like restarting mills) are fulfilled.
The Road Ahead
Merkle Standard has explored expanding its energy intake to 600 megawatts, though infrastructure upgrades could cost over $100 million. Even reaching 145 MW may require $40 million in grid improvements.
“The real killer isn’t money,” Stahl admitted. “It’s time—about three years.”
Still, there are signs of commitment. The company requested a study on restoring 70 MW to reactivate paper production—a promise made when Allrise bought the site for $18.1 million in 2020. Locals remain divided on whether that promise will be kept.
Phyllis Kardos of Responsible Growth NE Washington supports job creation but fears environmental trade-offs. “People come here for clean air and quiet,” she said. “Not because of crypto or smelters.”
👉 See how next-gen blockchain projects are balancing innovation with sustainability.
Final Thoughts: Innovation vs. Responsibility
The story unfolding in Usk reflects a national dilemma: how to balance technological advancement with environmental stewardship and community well-being.
Core keywords driving this narrative include crypto mining, Bitcoin, renewable energy, sustainable blockchain, energy consumption, rural economic development, proof-of-work, and electronic waste—all central to understanding the broader implications.
While Merkle Standard touts carbon-neutral ambitions—even suggesting carbon-negative potential through heat repurposing—the long-term impacts remain uncertain. Regulators watch closely. Communities weigh risks and rewards.
For now, the fans keep spinning in Usk. Whether this digital gold rush leaves behind lasting value—or just noise and heat—will depend on choices made in the years ahead.
👉 Learn how you can invest responsibly in the evolving world of digital assets.