The crypto market took a nosedive over the weekend, with Bitcoin plunging below $60,000 and continuing its slide to touch $49,000 — an 18.5% drop in 24 hours. Ethereum fared even worse, tumbling 25% and breaking below $2,100. The broad sell-off has deepened the slump in an already sluggish decentralized finance (DeFi) sector, hitting innovative projects like Ethena Labs particularly hard.
According to DeFiLlama data, Ethena Labs’ revenue has collapsed since March. Its current monthly income stands at just $1.03 million — down a staggering **96%** from its peak of $26.26 million. On an annualized basis, that translates to only $12.55 million in yearly revenue. This sharp contraction raises urgent questions about Ethena’s sustainability in a prolonged bear market.
👉 Discover how leading platforms are adapting to volatile crypto conditions.
How Ethena’s USDe Model Works
Ethena Labs’ synthetic dollar, USDe, is designed to maintain stability while generating yield through a complex hedging mechanism. The protocol uses Bitcoin (BTC) and staked Ethereum (stETH) as collateral, leveraging their staking rewards. To hedge price exposure, Ethena takes delta-neutral short positions on BTC and ETH perpetual futures — essentially balancing long spot exposure with short derivatives.
The core idea: use the yield from staking and positive funding rates from perpetual contracts to generate returns for sUSDe holders (the staked version of USDe), while keeping the stablecoin pegged to $1.
This model thrives in bullish markets — when traders are eager to go long on crypto, they pay positive funding rates to maintain their leveraged positions. Ethena collects these payments, turning them into yield for users.
However, this same mechanism becomes a liability when sentiment sours.
Negative Funding Rates: A Death Spiral?
For Ethena to remain profitable, funding rates must stay positive — otherwise, the protocol ends up paying exchanges to maintain its short hedges.
In early April, during a period of extreme market pessimism, ETH funding rates briefly hit -9%, while BTC hovered near just 2%. By July and August, conditions worsened dramatically. According to Ethena Labs’ official dashboard:
- Bitcoin average funding rate: -4.34%
- Ethereum average funding rate: -28.34%
With both major assets in deep negative territory, Ethena is now paying hefty fees to keep its hedges open — eroding profits and turning yields negative.
To mitigate risk, Ethena has gradually shifted its collateral mix toward Bitcoin. As of the latest data:
- 48% BTC
- 30% ETH
- 9% ETH Liquid Staking Tokens (LSTs)
- 13% USDT
Total value locked (TVL) sits at **$3.18 billion**, with a reserve fund of $46.5 million — a buffer against volatility, but one that may be tested in extended downturns.
Market Chaos and Mass Liquidations
The recent crash triggered widespread liquidations across derivatives markets. Coinglass data shows $10.2 billion** in total liquidations over 24 hours — with **$8.89 billion coming from long positions. As leveraged bulls got wiped out, demand for perpetual contracts evaporated, pushing funding rates further into negative territory.
This environment is catastrophic for Ethena’s yield engine. Without positive funding inflows, the protocol cannot sustain high returns — and users begin to exit.
On-chain analytics from Dune show repeated multi-million-dollar USDe burn events over the past month — a clear sign that users are redeeming their collateral and exiting the system.
Meanwhile, sUSDe supply has dropped by nearly $60 million in a week, indicating declining confidence in Ethena’s ability to deliver consistent yields.
Even ENA, Ethena’s governance token, hasn’t escaped the fallout. It briefly dipped to $0.232, marking a 21% drop in 24 hours amid growing concerns about the protocol’s long-term viability.
👉 See how top-tier platforms manage risk during market turbulence.
Was Ethena Built for Bear Markets?
During the bull run earlier in 2024, Ethena delivered impressive yields — at one point reaching 113.34% APY for sUSDe stakers. Even the lower end of the range offered 8.55%, far above traditional stablecoin returns.
But as markets turned bearish in June, yields began to falter. In mid-April, protocol returns briefly dipped into negative territory (-2.09%) before recovering temporarily. Since June, however, both protocol and sUSDe yields have remained below 20% — and are likely trending lower given delayed data updates.
This performance highlights a critical vulnerability: Ethena’s model is highly dependent on market sentiment. It works brilliantly in bull markets but struggles — or even loses money — when traders turn bearish.
MakerDAO founder Rune Christensen once considered allocating 600 million DAI to USDe via Morpho Labs — a major vote of confidence from a DeFi giant. But the proposal faced backlash over concerns about systemic risk and Ethena’s reliance on volatile funding rates.
Critics like analyst Duo Nine (@DU09BTC) have long warned that USDe’s depeg is inevitable — arguing that the larger the system grows, the more fragile it becomes under stress.
Can Ethena Adapt and Survive?
Ethena represents one of the most innovative experiments in modern DeFi — combining yield generation, delta hedging, and synthetic assets into a scalable product. Its rapid growth — achieving billions in TVL within months — is a testament to strong user demand for high-yield dollar-pegged assets.
But innovation comes with risk.
The current market environment is testing whether Ethena can survive beyond bullish cycles. With funding rates deeply negative and revenues shrinking by over 90%, the protocol faces its toughest challenge yet.
Key factors that will determine Ethena’s survival:
- Ability to maintain the USDe peg under redemption pressure
- Effectiveness of collateral diversification (especially shift toward BTC)
- Resilience of reserve funds during prolonged negative funding
- Potential adjustments to hedging strategies or yield mechanisms
While it’s too early to declare failure, Ethena must now prove it’s more than just a bull-market product.
👉 Explore how next-gen financial protocols are evolving in real time.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: What causes Ethena’s yield to drop?
A: Ethena’s yield depends heavily on positive funding rates from perpetual futures contracts. When traders go bearish and funding turns negative, Ethena must pay to maintain hedges — reducing or eliminating yields.
Q: Is USDe at risk of depegging?
A: While USDe has remained close to $1 (recently dipping to $0.997), sustained redemptions and loss of confidence could threaten its peg — especially if reserves are insufficient to handle large outflows.
Q: How does Ethena hedge against price volatility?
A: By taking short positions on BTC and ETH futures contracts equal to its long spot holdings, Ethena achieves delta neutrality — protecting against price swings but exposing itself to funding rate risk.
Q: Why did Ethena shift collateral toward Bitcoin?
A: As Ethereum’s price and staking yield became more volatile, Ethena reduced exposure by increasing BTC allocation — historically a more stable store of value in crypto downturns.
Q: Can Ethena recover if the market rebounds?
A: Yes — if bullish sentiment returns and funding rates turn positive again, Ethena’s yield engine could restart quickly, attracting users back into sUSDe staking.
Q: What happens if funding rates stay negative long-term?
A: Prolonged negative funding would force Ethena to burn reserves or adjust its strategy — possibly by reducing short positions or seeking alternative yield sources.
Core Keywords:
- Ethena
- USDe
- DeFi yield
- funding rate
- delta hedging
- crypto bear market
- sUSDe
- stablecoin innovation