The mid-year cryptocurrency ratings from Weiss Ratings have arrived, reigniting discussions across the digital asset community. Despite its dominant market position, Bitcoin once again lands at a modest C+, maintaining the same controversial grade it received earlier in the year. This evaluation underscores the ongoing debate about Bitcoin’s long-term investment value, technological scalability, and real-world adoption.
Weiss Ratings, recognized as the first financial rating agency to apply traditional letter grades (A to F) to cryptocurrencies, uses a proprietary, algorithm-driven methodology that evaluates assets across multiple dimensions. These include risk-return metrics, technology assessment, and adoption potential—offering investors a more nuanced view beyond price movements alone.
How Weiss Ratings Evaluates Cryptocurrencies
Weiss Ratings employs a balanced, multi-factor analysis designed to reflect both investment appeal and technical robustness. The grading system breaks down into three core components:
- Risk vs. Return: Assesses profit potential based on historical price trends and volatility, weighing upside opportunities against downside exposure.
- Technology: Analyzes the underlying blockchain’s code functionality, security, decentralization, transaction speed, scalability, and developer activity.
- Adoption: Measures real-world utility, including merchant acceptance, network usage, public awareness, and integration with financial systems.
This holistic approach aims to separate hype from substance—especially critical in a market often driven by speculation.
👉 Discover how top-rated digital assets are outperforming the market in 2025.
The Biggest Losers: Projects on the Brink
Not all cryptocurrencies are thriving. Some continue to struggle with technical flaws, lack of adoption, or governance issues.
In the latest update, four digital assets received an alarming E- rating—the lowest possible score.
- Expanse (EXP): A decentralized platform built on Ethereum, launched in 2015. Despite early ambitions, it has failed to gain traction or meaningful development momentum.
- Matchpool (GUP): A blockchain-based dating app that rewards matchmakers with tokens. While innovative in concept, it lacks user engagement and real-world scalability.
- Quark: A decentralized digital currency system focused on security. However, limited adoption and outdated technology have left it behind.
- SaluS: With over a million coins in circulation, this cryptocurrency shows minimal utility and negligible network activity.
These projects highlight a growing truth in the crypto space: innovation alone isn’t enough. Without active communities, strong development teams, and practical use cases, even well-intentioned initiatives risk fading into obscurity.
The Middle Ground: Average Performers
Several major cryptocurrencies land squarely in the middle of the pack with a C+ rating—same as Bitcoin.
NEM (XEM)
Despite being associated with the infamous 2018 Coincheck hack, NEM earns a neutral score due to its solid underlying technology and continued enterprise interest in its NEM Smart Asset system.
Ontology (ONT)
Often compared to NEO for its focus on digital identity and decentralized trust frameworks, Ontology maintains moderate scores across technology and adoption. Its recent airdrop to NEO holders boosted visibility but not necessarily long-term utility.
Ripple (XRP)
Ripple continues to push into emerging markets like India, aiming to revolutionize cross-border payments. However, ongoing legal challenges from U.S. regulators cast uncertainty over its future classification and market access.
STEEM & Stellar Lumens (XLM)
Both platforms show average performance. STEEM struggles with community trust after corporate takeovers, while Stellar remains relevant in remittance corridors but lacks breakout momentum.
Tron (TRX)
After launching its mainnet, Tron secured attention for partnerships like Pornhub accepting TRX for payments. While this boosted short-term visibility, long-term adoption remains questionable.
These mid-tier assets reflect a broader trend: many blockchains offer promise but haven’t yet delivered widespread, sustainable value.
👉 See which mid-tier cryptos are showing signs of breakout potential in 2025.
The Top Contenders: Leading the Pack
No cryptocurrency earned an A rating—indicating that even the best performers have room for improvement.
Cardano (ADA) – B+
Cardano stands out as the highest-rated blockchain with a B+, thanks to its research-driven development model and peer-reviewed protocols. Since launching its testnet earlier in the year, ADA has attracted growing investor confidence. Its listing on major platforms like eToro contributed to significant price appreciation and increased accessibility.
EOS – B+
EOS also earns a B+, having successfully transitioned to its official blockchain in June. Designed for high-speed dApp execution, EOS supports complex decentralized applications with low latency.
However, governance concerns persist—including centralization risks and RAM resource shortages—that prevent it from achieving a higher score.
Ethereum (ETH) – B
Ethereum holds steady at a B, slightly below the top tier. While it remains the leading smart contract platform, security incidents—including a reported $20 million theft from vulnerable nodes—have raised red flags.
On the positive side:
- Ethereum received informal clarification from the SEC that ETH is not classified as a security.
- It continues to drive innovation through new token standards (like ERC-1155).
- High-profile figures like Google co-founder Sergey Brin have shown public interest in its ecosystem.
Still, scalability limitations and high gas fees remain pressing challenges.
NEO – B+
NEO rounds out the top tier with a B+, earning praise for launching its first fully decentralized network node—marking what Weiss calls “the dawn of decentralization” for the platform. In April, it also processed its first decentralized transaction, a symbolic step toward greater autonomy.
Known as “China’s Ethereum,” NEO focuses on digitizing assets and enabling smart economies through blockchain technology.
FAQ: Understanding the Weiss Cryptocurrency Ratings
Q: Why is Bitcoin only rated C+ when it's the most valuable cryptocurrency?
A: Weiss emphasizes that market capitalization doesn’t equate to investment quality. While Bitcoin leads in brand recognition and liquidity, it scores lower on scalability, transaction speed, and energy efficiency compared to newer blockchains.
Q: Does a low Weiss rating mean I should sell my crypto?
A: Not necessarily. Ratings should be one tool among many. They reflect risk-return profiles and technological maturity but don’t predict short-term price movements. Always conduct your own research.
Q: Can cryptocurrencies improve their ratings over time?
A: Yes. Weiss updates its rankings regularly based on performance, upgrades, and adoption trends. For example, Ethereum could rise if Layer 2 solutions reduce congestion and costs.
Q: Are stablecoins included in these ratings?
A: Not in this report. Weiss focuses on volatile digital assets with investment and technological variables rather than pegged-value currencies.
Q: Is Weiss Ratings biased against older blockchains?
A: No evidence suggests bias. Bitcoin and Ethereum are assessed objectively using the same criteria as newer projects. Their grades reflect current capabilities, not legacy status.
Q: What does an E- rating imply for a cryptocurrency’s future?
A: An E- signals severe weaknesses in technology, adoption, or both. Such projects face high failure risk unless significant improvements occur.
Final Thoughts: What These Ratings Mean for Investors
The 2025 mid-year Weiss Ratings offer a sobering reality check: no cryptocurrency currently meets all the criteria for an "excellent" investment or technological leader.
Bitcoin's persistent C+ reflects its role as a store of value rather than a scalable payment network. Meanwhile, innovators like Cardano and EOS lead in design but face governance and adoption hurdles.
For investors, these ratings emphasize the importance of diversification and due diligence. High potential comes with high risk—especially in an unregulated, fast-evolving space.
As blockchain technology matures, so too will evaluation standards. Until then, tools like Weiss Ratings provide valuable benchmarks for navigating complexity.
👉 Explore how top-rated cryptos are shaping the future of finance in 2025.